Discover the 12 law enforcement policies every agency needs, from use of force to body cameras, plus what makes each policy hold up in court and in public.Article Highlights
- 12 essential law enforcement policies
- How to develop and implement policies
- Emerging law enforcement policy areas
- Policies to protect officers, the people, and your agency
- FAQs
Police officers have a high-risk job, making snap decisions that can sometimes have a life-or-death impact.
Their mission is to serve and protect their local community, but it's often a community that's indifferent, if not hostile, to their efforts. Any law enforcement agency that sends its officers into the street without proper training and guidance is setting them up for failure.
Providing officers with effective law enforcement policies is just one piece of the puzzle in helping them succeed in their roles. Law enforcement policies set criteria and establish expectations for professional and ethical conduct. They equip officers with the tools to make the best decisions in a situation or even relieve them of the need to make a judgment they're not sure about. Law enforcement policies also promote accountability for their actions, which can greatly help build trust between the police and their communities.
These days, policies are under increased scrutiny from the public, the media, and the courts. When an incident arises, they're searching for gaps in policy or a lack of policy altogether. And when a problem or a lawsuit comes up, lawyers and courts will review your law enforcement policies to see if an officer was warranted in their response or not. If there are no policies to address that specific situation, your agency and your officer have no defense.
Every law enforcement agency needs written policies covering its highest-liability operations. This guide breaks down 12 essential policies, including use of force, vehicle pursuits, body-worn cameras, and active shooter response, and explains what each should contain. Start with use of force and high-speed pursuits, the two areas that generate the most lawsuits, then build out from there.
12 essential law enforcement policies at a glance
Use this quick-reference table to see what each policy covers and the primary risk it's designed to address. Then, keep reading to learn more about the elements included in each policy.
|
Policy |
What It Governs |
Primary Risk It Addresses |
|
Drone Policy |
Purpose, parameters, and procedures for using drones in law enforcement operations, including surveillance limits and footage retention |
Privacy violations, civilian distrust, and non-compliance with FAA and state drone regulations |
|
Social Media Policy |
Official departmental social media use and officers' personal social media conduct |
Reputational damage from offensive posts and mishandling of official public communications |
|
Narcan/Naloxone Policy |
When and how officers administer naloxone to reverse opioid overdoses |
Preventable overdose deaths and liability from improper administration |
|
Body Camera Policy |
When cameras must be on or off, recording limits, video retention, and release procedures |
Accusations of misconduct, privacy violations, and lack of accountability |
|
Policing the Mentally Ill |
Officer recognition of mental health crises and de-escalation approaches, often via crisis intervention training |
Escalation of encounters and use-of-force incidents involving people in crisis |
|
Use-of-Force Policy |
Appropriate levels of physical and deadly force based on subject behavior and threat level |
Excessive force lawsuits and split-second decision errors |
|
National Consensus Policy on Use of Force |
Shared guidance across law enforcement organizations on de-escalation, less-lethal force, and justifications for lethal force |
Inconsistent use-of-force standards across agencies |
|
Communicable Disease Policy |
Officer protection protocols when exposed to bloodborne or airborne illness during public contact |
Officer infection and spread of illness within the department |
|
Active Shooter Response Policy |
Step-by-step multi-agency response procedures from initial 911 call through after-action review |
Response confusion and delayed coordination during mass-casualty events |
|
Pursuit Policy |
Conditions under which officers may engage in high-speed vehicle pursuits |
Pursuit-related injuries, deaths, and resulting litigation |
|
Racial Profiling Policy |
Prohibition on using race, ethnicity, or national origin as a basis for enforcement action |
Bias-based policing complaints, lawsuits, and loss of community trust |
|
Take Home Car Policy |
Conditions for off-duty use of assigned vehicles, including insurance, maintenance, and conduct standards |
Vehicle misuse and public relations issues from off-duty incidents |
1. Law Enforcement Drone Policy
There are several federal and state regulations on the use of drones. The Federal Aviation Administration has passed several regulations on drone use, including the Operations Over People Rule.
Many states also have their own laws about drone use. If your law enforcement agency uses drones, you are required to follow all state and federal regulations, as well as regulate civilians' use.
Why does your agency need a drone policy?
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and a number of civilians have concerns about the police using armed drones against civilians or using them for surveillance purposes. A drone policy can help alleviate many of those concerns and assure citizens that they can trust your agency to use drones to keep people safe, not spy on them.
What should a law enforcement drone policy include?
A good law enforcement drone policy will establish the purpose and parameters for using drones in your law enforcement operations. It needs to address the laws, regulations, and proper procedures, and to establish how much surveillance is acceptable, as well as how long you will keep surveillance images and video footage.
You can learn more about writing a drone policy for your department here.
2. Law enforcement social media policy
A social media policy establishes guidelines around your staff’s use of social media accounts. Roughly 70% of Americans use social media, and people under 30 especially use Snapchat, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook.
There are many instances where law enforcement agencies use social media to communicate directly with citizens and gather information about suspects and crimes. But people are paying close attention to the things your officers are posting on their personal accounts, and they can do major damage to your department's reputation with a single post.
Why does law enforcement need a social media policy?
Your officers have their own social media accounts that they use in their personal time. If one of them posts the wrong thing, including something confidential, racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise offensive, it can be picked up and spread across the internet and through the media. That can damage any goodwill you've created with your community.
While you can't entirely control what your officers post on their personal accounts outside of work, your social media policy can certainly create guidelines and expectations of their personal integrity. There are already codes of conduct and behavior that they have to follow, so your agency should be able to set those same parameters for online behavior.
What are elements of a good social media policy?
A social media policy should also state what your department employees can and should post in an official capacity. For example, some states are even passing laws about what law enforcement agencies can post on social media. In July 2021, California passed AB 1475, now codified as Penal Code § 13665, prohibiting law enforcement agencies from posting mugshots of nonviolent crime suspects on social media except in a few narrow circumstances.
The law was expanded in 2023 by AB 994, and the California Attorney General issued formal compliance guidance in October 2024 to help agencies apply it correctly. You can learn more about a law enforcement social media policy here.
3. Narcan policy for law enforcement
Narcan is the brand name of the drug naloxone, which is a prescription medicine used to treat someone and save them from a known or suspected opioid overdose, such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine. If the person is having difficulty breathing, is sleepy, or is unable to respond, someone can give them a dose of Narcan and block the effects of the opioids and reduce the overdose symptoms.
Law enforcement officers and first responders now carry naloxone, which was usually administered by injection, but is now available in a nasal spray. The FDA has approved multiple over-the-counter naloxone nasal sprays in recent years, including generic and additional branded options, and continues to broaden access to these products to help fight opioid overdoses.
Because it's now easier to use, many more police departments have begun using Narcan. However, it doesn't cure addiction, which means officers may find that they are using naloxone on the same person more than once.
Also, while most states allow police to use Narcan, some states do not. A law enforcement Narcan policy should comply with state and local laws, as well as Good Samaritan laws that protect overdose victims or bystanders who administer naloxone from prosecution.
What are elements of a good Narcan/Maloxone policy?
A Narcan policy should include:
-
a basic overview of drug abuse and addiction,
-
how to recognize the symptoms of overdose
-
when and how to administer it
-
what dosage is necessary
-
how to work with people coming out of an overdose
-
what to do once the subject is stabilized (i.e., follow up with emergency medical services, addiction referral programs, and so on)
You can learn more about a law enforcement Narcan policy here.
4. Law enforcement body camera policy
A body camera, or body-worn camera (BWC), is a camera that an officer wears to record interactions with the public and suspects. Departments around the U.S. have adopted body cameras to increase police accountability.
Why does law enforcement need a body camera policy?
A clear policy will protect officers from accusations of misusing BWCs or violating privacy. It also ensures that BWC use follows the laws and regulations and that they're helpful rather than a burden. There have been too many news stories of officers who turned off their body-worn cameras before managing a situation or dealing with an individual.
What are elements of a good BWC policy?
A good body camera policy should outline when officers are expected to turn cameras on or off. It should specify the limits of recording victims, witnesses, and private situations. It should also cover how long the department will keep videos, whether officers can view the video before writing a report, and when the department will release videos to the media and the public.
You can learn more about a law enforcement body camera policy here.
5. Policing the mentally ill
Policing people with a mental illness is one of the biggest challenges facing the police today. Because of budget cuts to mental health facilities and services, more people with mental illnesses are left to their own devices and are often struggling just to survive. Many are homeless and have addiction issues.
According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), more than 1 in 5 U.S. adults experience mental illness each year, and 1 in 20 U.S. adults experience a serious mental illness each year that substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities. People with mental illness aren't necessarily more prone to violent behavior than anyone else, but when someone is in a mental health crisis, bystanders often call 9-1-1.
If officers don't have the proper training or guidance, interactions can often escalate, which puts everyone in danger. Studies have found that people with untreated mental illness are 16 times more likely to be killed during a police encounter than other civilians. The Washington Post has tracked every fatal police shooting in the U.S. since 2015, and its ongoing database shows that more than 1 in 5 people fatally shot by police have a mental illness, with more than 1,400 people with mental illness fatally shot since the database began.
In most of the cases, the individual was armed, but police weren't responding to a crime. Instead, they had been called by relatives, neighbors, or bystanders "worried that a mentally fragile person was behaving erratically. More than 50 people were explicitly suicidal."
What are elements of a law enforcement policy for interacting with people with mental illnesses?
A good mental illness dealings policy includes teaching officers to recognize the signs of mental illness and best practices for policing the mentally ill. They include tactics like crisis intervention training, crisis intervention team (CIT), and de-escalation. They're also revisiting and revising their use-of-force policies, and partnering with the local mental health community.
You can learn more about policing the mentally ill here.
6. Law enforcement use-of-force policy
A law enforcement use-of-force policy states how much physical and deadly force an officer may use when dealing with a potential suspect or a general member of the public. This policy establishes appropriate levels of force when dealing with subjects who resist arrest, act aggressively, are potentially or actually armed, or are threatening to harm someone.
Why does law enforcement need a use-of-force policy?
Use-of-force is one of the most crucial policies for law enforcement because officers have to make split-second decisions about how to protect themselves and the public. Incidents can escalate quickly, and officers need to know how to respond with the right amount of force to bring a situation under control.
Use-of-force incidents remain one of the most high-liability areas for law enforcement, resulting in thousands of lawsuits filed against police departments each year. Settlement costs illustrate the scale: New York City alone paid out more than $117 million in 2025 to resolve police misconduct lawsuits, with nearly $800 million paid out since 2019, and that's just one department.
What are elements of a good use-of-force policy?
Your use-of-force policy should define levels of force, including what constitutes deadly force. It should detail weapons use, de-escalation tactics, and spell out what is appropriate and inappropriate uses of force.
You can learn more about a law enforcement use-of-force policy here.
7. The National Consensus Policy on Use of Force
In 2017, a group of law enforcement leadership organizations released their National Consensus Policy on Use of Force, including the Fraternal Order of Police, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, and the Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association, to name a few.
The collaboration began as a way to provide guidance for law enforcement agencies to improve their own use-of-force policies and includes a section on de-escalation and less-lethal force, as well as justifications for lethal force.
What does the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force do?
First and foremost, the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force stresses the need to "value and preserve human life." In doing so, it instructs officers to use only the amount of force necessary to regain control of an incident, as judged from the perspective of the officer involved. It gives officers license to use force "only when no reasonably effective alternative appears to exist."
However, it does limit the level of force to that which a "reasonably prudent officer" would use in a similar case.
What are some elements of the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force?
- It provides guidelines for every incident that involves the use of force, and it instructs officers to stop using force once the incident is under control.
- It says officers should not use force against people who are restrained unless necessary to prevent bodily harm or to prevent them from escaping.
- It encourages accountability and says officers should stop other officers from using excessive force when it's safe to do so.
- It admonishes agencies to document and investigate all use-of-force incidents.
- It spells out the minimum effective action and details the scale of force, including de-escalation, less-lethal force, and deadly force.
You can learn more about the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force here.
8. Communicable disease policy in law enforcement
A communicable disease policy sets the standards for how police officers will deal with people who might expose them to a communicable disease. It should explain the most common diseases and the steps officers need to take to protect themselves against possible infection.
A communicable disease policy is designed to protect law enforcement officers as well as the public by minimizing the risk of exposure and educating police about possible methods of transmission.
Why does law enforcement need a communicable disease policy?
Law enforcement needs a communicable disease policy to protect themselves and others from the risk of contracting or spreading highly contagious, potentially deadly illnesses. Since law enforcement officers interact with the public in a number of different settings, whether subduing a suspect, making an arrest, writing a ticket, or having a simple conversation, there are myriad ways officers can become infected with bloodborne and airborne illnesses.
The more times they interact with the public, the greater the risk. Plus, there's a greater chance they can bring that same illness into the station house, sharing it among fellow officers and civilian employees.
What are elements of a communicable disease policy?
Your communicable disease policy should have input from experts like your local hospital and EMT leaders. Borrow definitions, contagions, and procedures from those policies and tailor them to fit your own agency.
Your policy should also contain information from CDC, OSHA, and NIOSH on communicable diseases for the workplace. Many law enforcement communicable disease policies contain language and information from those three organizations.
9. Law enforcement active shooter response policy
An active shooter policy details the steps responding officers should take when dealing with a gunman (or gunmen) who are shooting people in a public setting. It details the agency's response to the shooter, sets up an incident command, and provides roles for all first responders who arrive on the scene.
It answers questions like the number of officers needed to enter a building, who is in charge, how do you decide which roles are important, and what should be done as other officers arrive?
Why does law enforcement need an active shooter response policy?
Law enforcement needs an active shooter response policy so officers know how to react in an emergency situation involving a mass shooting. The policy should take you step-by-step, in chronological order, through the entire response scenario, beginning with the first 911 call through to the after-action debriefing and additional training.
This policy needs to be developed ahead of time because you don't have time to figure out your deployment and dispatching strategies when a mass shooting begins. The more detailed your policy can be, the better. It starts with the dispatcher getting the call, details how the first officer should respond, how to search for the subject, what to do for the injured people, establishing a perimeter, and so on.
Because this is a high-stress, very intense situation, spell out as many steps as possible beforehand to remove any kind of guesswork or disagreement over possible strategies. If you can imagine 50 officers responding from different districts, cities, counties, etc., you'll understand why having this policy in place is important.
What are elements of an active shooter response policy?
An active shooter response policy should include many of the same elements, regardless of the city, county, or region. There may be differences due to location, size of the city, and size of the force, but they should all have some elements in common.
The policy should include several major steps, including (but not limited to):
-
situation assessment
-
individual officer intervention and response
-
rescue task forces
-
incident command
-
community notification
It should also include sections on debriefing and additional training. You can learn more about a law enforcement active shooter policy here.
10. Law enforcement pursuit policy
A law enforcement pursuit policy establishes the parameters for a police officer to engage in a high-speed car chase of a suspect. It deals with a dynamically unfolding, high-liability situation where a lot of damage can be caused by the driver fleeing and the officer's response during the pursuit.
For that reason, most vehicle pursuit guidelines prohibit any kind of high-speed vehicle pursuit unless the suspect has committed a violent crime or is in danger of committing a violent crime. Officers are instead urged to use detection methods to catch the suspect later. Some policies use a logic-based decision tree, others allow the officer's best judgment, and still, others require supervisor approval and monitoring.
Why does law enforcement need a pursuit policy?
Law enforcement needs a pursuit policy because many high-speed pursuits are determined to be unjustifiable, especially when many of them result in accidents, injuries, and deaths. Those pursuits (and even the justifiable ones) lead to more lawsuits being filed against different police departments as a result.
What are elements of a good pursuit policy?
A pursuit policy is usually written in chronological order and explains what goes into a decision-making process. It should include guidance in terms of road and traffic conditions, the weather, and the condition of the suspect's vehicle.
Plus, each department may have its own particular details to contend with, such as what kinds of vehicles can make pursuits, whether an unmarked vehicle can engage, and whether it should break off pursuit once a marked vehicle joins.
11. Law Enforcement Racial Profiling Policy
A racial profiling policy, also called bias-based policing policy, sets the tone for your agency and officers about what's expected of them when it comes to dealing with people of a different race, religion, nationality, or sexual orientation. It sets the standards for what is expected of your officers and what the department will not tolerate.
The policy says that officers may not use race, color, ethnicity, or national origin as the motivating factor for enforcement action. Most accreditation commissions require that a law enforcement agency has a formal racial profiling policy.
Why does law enforcement need a racial profiling policy?
Law enforcement needs a racial profiling policy because, first, it enhances trust and cooperation between the community and its police force. Second, it reduces liability and prevents lawsuits. The cost of the racial profiling lawsuits filed across the country is in the millions of dollars.
Police departments are considered high-risk, high-liability organizations, so your insurance agency already thinks you're at higher risk for a lawsuit. But without liability insurance, your agency could be sued into bankruptcy or worse.
Liability insurance has forced some small departments to disband entirely. In California, Louisiana, and Ohio, insurers have pulled coverage from police departments after repeated misconduct lawsuits, leading several cities to shut down their police forces rather than pay for replacement coverage.
What are elements of a good racial profiling policy?
A good racial profiling policy includes the language used in prohibiting the use of race, color, national origin, or ethnicity as the motivating factor for officers interacting with an individual.
The policy should also include training, both online and in-person. Training shows that you're trying to promote diversity and that your police standards are fair and impartial.
12. Law Enforcement Take-Home Car Policy
A take-home car program allows a police officer to take their assigned vehicle home at the end of each shift and drive it for off-duty use. It's a way to avoid putting mileage and wear on their own vehicles.
There are critics of the program, however, especially when officers are found to abuse the program. A take-home car policy can reduce some of these complaints by showing you're committed to your officers using the vehicles responsibly. Plus, it establishes parameters of acceptable use and details consequences for misuse.
Why does law enforcement need a take-home car policy?
A take-home car policy protects the department from certain issues. It establishes who's responsible for insurance coverage while commuting to and from work or during off-duty hours, sets standards for representing the agency, and sets rules for things like speeding, maintenance, cleaning, and responding to incidents or emergencies.
The take-home vehicle is just as conspicuous as a uniform, and the driver is representing the department. Even if the officer were off-duty and wearing civilian clothes, if he or she is speeding or driving recklessly, they can create PR problems for the department.
What are elements of a good take-home car policy?
A take-home car policy should cover what is or isn’t allowed while operating a take-home car, as well as the conditions in which someone can have one, and how to be proactive in terms of operations, maintenance, and responding to an emergency. It should also establish restrictions on off-duty driving, whether family members can ride, and dress code while driving off-duty.
You can learn more about a law enforcement take-home car policy here.
How to develop and implement law enforcement policies
Knowing which police department policies and procedures your agency needs is only half the job. Getting them drafted, approved, and actually followed in the field is where most of the real work happens.
Start with a draft that goes through legal review before it ever reaches an officer. Rather than starting from scratch, most agencies adapt model policies from organizations like the IACP or their state chiefs association. These templates reflect current standard operating procedures and best practices across the field, and they typically already align with law enforcement accreditation (CALEA) requirements, which saves time when your agency's next assessment comes around. From there, tailor the language to your community, department size, and local laws before command staff and the chief or sheriff give final sign-off.
Once a policy is approved, rollout matters as much as the writing. Officer training and policy acknowledgment should happen together, not as two separate steps.
Finally, build policy management for law enforcement agencies around an ongoing policy review cycle rather than a one-time project. High-liability policies, especially use of force and pursuit policies, deserve at least an annual look, with the full manual reviewed on a rotating basis. Whenever a policy changes, officers need refresher training on what's different and why, not just a notification that a new version exists.
Emerging law enforcement policy areas
The policies covered above remain the foundation of a well-run department, but the policy landscape continues to evolve, increasing police accountability and transparency. A few areas have matured enough in recent years that agencies without a written policy are increasingly exposed.
Duty to intervene
Duty to intervene has become one of the most widely adopted new mandates, requiring officers to step in and stop a colleague from using excessive force when it's safe to do so.
This concept already appeared in the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force, but many states have since written it into law, making it a required addition to any use of force continuum rather than an optional best practice. The IACP Policy Center now maintains dedicated duty to intervene guidance built around the idea that a culture of intervention protects both public trust and officer accountability.
Less-lethal munitions policies
Less-lethal munitions policies are also catching up to changes in equipment and de-escalation tactics. A 2025 Congressional Research Service report found that most local, county, and state agencies now authorize some form of less-lethal weapon, and it flagged ongoing gaps in mortality and injury data that agencies should account for in their own policy language.
Facial recognition technology
Facial recognition technology has moved from experimental to operational in many agencies, which means policies now need to address data retention, permissible use cases, and oversight. A 2024 GAO report on federal facial recognition use found that several federal law enforcement agencies still lacked formal civil-rights safeguards for the technology, underscoring why a written policy matters even for agencies confident in their current practices.
AI tools in policing, from predictive analytics to automated report writing, raise similar questions and are quickly becoming their own policy category. The IACP's AI Policy Center resources now offer model policy language specifically for AI procurement and use.
Agencies that get ahead of these areas, writing clear policy language before an incident forces the issue, are in a stronger position on both the accountability and the liability and risk management side of the equation.
Law enforcement policies to protect officers, the people, and your agency
There are more than these 12 law enforcement policies, but these are the biggest and most important ones we've seen in the last couple of years. You only have to read the news to see the importance of policies like active shooter response, high-speed pursuits, policing the mentally ill, use of force, and take-home vehicles.
PowerDMS has spent decades helping police departments navigate these tricky waters and create policies that guide their officers, give their communities peace of mind, and re-establish a sense of trust between the department and the community.
Read more today about how policy management software can help your organization function at its best.
Frequently asked questions
What are law enforcement policies?
Law enforcement policies are written directives that set standards for how officers handle specific situations, from traffic stops to deadly force encounters. They establish expectations for professional conduct, guide split-second decisions, and create accountability. Courts, accreditation bodies, and insurers all look to an agency’s written policies when evaluating whether an officer’s actions were justified.
How often should law enforcement policies be updated?
Most agencies review high-liability policies like use of force and vehicle pursuits annually, with a full manual review every two to three years. Policies should also be updated immediately when new legislation passes, case law shifts, or an incident exposes a gap. Accreditation bodies like CALEA require documented proof of regular review.
Who writes law enforcement policies?
Policy development typically falls to command staff, with input from legal counsel, union representatives, and subject matter experts inside the department. Many agencies adapt model policies from organizations like the IACP or their state chiefs association, then tailor the language to local laws, department size, and community expectations before the chief or sheriff gives final approval.
What is the difference between a policy and a procedure in law enforcement?
A policy states what an agency expects and why, such as when officers may use deadly force. A procedure explains how to carry that expectation out step by step, such as the exact reporting process after a use of force incident. Policies set the standard, procedures put it into practice, and most agencies combine both in a single directive system.